Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 10 '24 at 09:48
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 59.1
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 171
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 343
41% 316 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.2% Average
Lighting 58.7
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 74.6
48% 62.8 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 64.9
Splatting 38.9
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SB960GB-RVVL3-25SAT3 960GB
549GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS15981
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 224 230 225 229 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
Read 249
Write 239
Mixed 236
SusWrite 227
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 10.8
57% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.5
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 16.3
14% 21.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YKO 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 17.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 27" 1280 720 XMIB008 P27FBB-RG
Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,396 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $151
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback