Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 77.4
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 122
57% 91.8 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.6 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
274GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 80 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 75.5
Write 92.8
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 81.4
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.2
412% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-082.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 128 49 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15CB
Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback