Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210721
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 07:00
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 96
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 645
68% 546 Pts
64-Core 657
41% 657 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$141
Asus(1043 86B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 58
Parallax 49.1
46% 54.5 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 46.8
38% 46.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M390 500GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EHFM32.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 359 372 134 73 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 446
Write 228
Mixed 309
SusWrite 212
66% 299 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 26.6
98% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 445
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 408
296% 387 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 303%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U320016G16A-BB10 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 54
74% 54 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 215 57 60 22" 1280 720 ONN0000 100002480
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback