Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DZ77GA-70K
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime13 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 23:14
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 475
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 140
Parallax 140
105% 136 fps
MRender 126
Gravity 140
Splatting 120
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 120 52 47 45 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 480
Write 181
Mixed 399
SusWrite 121
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 35.7
121% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 351
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 80%
Great: 121%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
100GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 162 114 60 114 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 479
Write 426
Mixed 404
SusWrite 138
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$130
171GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 11,919
Mixed 61.5
4,282% 5,990 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX 04CD F3-2400C11-4GAB KHX2400C11D3/4GX 04CD F3-2400C11-4GAB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.6
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 0P 5R 7G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 57% 35 81 21 144 24.5" 1920 1080 ACR0724 VG252Q
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback