Today's hottest deals

Mitac MZ1-10ADP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMitac MZ1-10ADP  (all builds)
MotherboardMiTAC MZ1-10ADP
Memory59 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 23:12
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900E
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Memory 71.5
1-Core 195
2-Core 373
110% 213 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,107
109% 894 Pts
64-Core 1,709
106% 1,709 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 118%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TMTE662T2 1TB
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42B8T4EA
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,525
Write 1,585
Mixed 1,396
405% 1,835 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 237
4K Mixed 90.7
328% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,211
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 484
545% 928 MB/s
Poor: 202% Great: 303%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
28GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 50.9
Mixed 72.6
96% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.1
156% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS4GSA64V8E 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
145% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 59.5
MC Mixed 53.7
162% 56.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 26.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 145%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 11% 114 38 31 64 0" 1280 720
History: Score 32: 0P 4R 2G 6B | Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback