Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.67% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook x360 1030 G7 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 876D
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '24 at 03:17
Run Duration	65 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10610U 49 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 116 2-Core 196 71% 127 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 380 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 876D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 8.5 Parallax 7.3 5% 7.23 fps	MRender 9.8 Gravity 6.6 Splatting 10.1 7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT53E1G32D4NQ-046W:E 2x8GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.2% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 25 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 20.7 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	56	60	13.2"	1280 720	CMN13A9

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 249 samples	68x
Quadro M6000 24GBNvidiaBench 75%, 361 samples	1x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
hynix BC511 HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GBSKBench 163%, 5,553 samples	10x
KIOXIA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 169%, 5,284 samples	7x
MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 172%, 3,650 samples	6x

RAM
MT53E1G32D4NQ-046W:E 2x8GBMicronBench 80%, 70 samples	20x
H9HCNNNCPMALHR-NEE ) 2x8GBHynixBench 81%, 50 samples	14x
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	13x