Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 16:56
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$245
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 199
2-Core 417
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 790
8-Core 1,349
130% 1,069 Pts
64-Core 1923
119% 1923 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 113%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.7% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 139
Parallax 124
99% 128 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 128
Splatting 117
98% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 864 478 53 57 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,376
Write 924
Mixed 857
SusWrite 260
190% 854 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 58.8
209% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 352
331% 498 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 161%
Great: 209%
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 3.2.J.OF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2778 2771 2772 2754 2776 2750 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
411% Outstanding
Read 2,273
Write 4,239
Mixed 3,036
SusWrite 2,767
700% 3,079 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 62.9
225% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 2,016
DQ Write 1,706
DQ Mixed 1,847
1,388% 1,856 MB/s
Poor: 353%
This bench: 411%
Great: 464%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 137 138 137 138 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 158
Write 125
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 136
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
616GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 122 122 123 124 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Seagate ST20000NE000-3G5101 20TB
11.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 244 250 248 248 251 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 72% Great: 91%
Seagate ST20000NE000-3G5101 20TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 177 182 182 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 72% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C40-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 48.5
MC Write 38.7
MC Mixed 43.7
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 45.4
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 44.8
130% 45.4 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 120 34" 1280 720 AUS3438 VG34VQL3A
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $2,055
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback