Asus PRIME A520M-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A520M-A II  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 00:22
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 4100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 135
2-Core 274
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 715
77% 610 Pts
64-Core 709
44% 709 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.2% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 108
Parallax 119
96% 115 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 110
Splatting 98.6
101% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
812GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,841
Write 2,377
Mixed 2,002
466% 2,073 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 62.1
203% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,173
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 970
709% 939 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 441%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
195GB free
Firmware: SBFKT1A3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 314
Write 150
Mixed 253
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 33.4
126% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 186
162% 236 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-426.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 32.4
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 41.4
SC Mixed 28.1
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 0P 2R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 12% 84 210 56 60 21.7" 1920 1057 GSM5BC9 LG FHD
Typical PRIME A520M-A II Builds (Compare 511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A520M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback