Today's hottest deals

Asus K56CA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 months ago, 2 month ago.
SystemAsus K56CA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K56CA
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120919
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 15 '24 at 13:40
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 78.1
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 75.5
45% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 1587) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 389
Write 258
Mixed 285
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 13.1
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 8.6
39% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 87.6
DQ Write 49.4
DQ Mixed 41.5
38% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.4
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMO1590
Typical K56CA Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K56CA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback