Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateMar 14 '24 at 20:40
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 596
64% 511 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.5 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1014 512GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1090
Write 1,858
Mixed 1,426
329% 1,458 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 43.6
140% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 564
DQ Write 465
DQ Mixed 508
382% 512 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 288%
Nvme WDC WDS500G2B0C-00PXH0 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 974
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,242
289% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 42.3
145% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 493
DQ Mixed 529
401% 540 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G26C16S4B.8FD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 2R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 30% 44 209 56 144 15.5" 1536 793 AUO82ED
Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,968 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback