Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro7,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemApple MacPro7,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27AD2F918AE68F61
Memory90.4 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '24 at 05:30
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-3245
CPU0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 119
2-Core 238
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 952
84% 714 Pts
64-Core 2,593
160% 2,593 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
Gigabyte(1458 232C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 249
Parallax 494
196% 328 fps
MRender 412
Gravity 210
Splatting 331
260% 318 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 194%
Great: 209%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$193
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,312
Write 2,444
Mixed 2,396
534% 2,384 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 102
334% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 999
DQ Write 743
DQ Mixed 858
645% 866 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7CJR4N-WM 6x16GB
6 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 74
MC Mixed 53.8
178% 62.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 10.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 150%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3209 M32UC
Typical MacPro7,1 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: Apple MacPro7,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 150% - Outstanding Total price: $69
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback