Peladn HA-4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemPeladn HA-4  (all builds)
MotherboardPELADN HA-4
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '24 at 21:10
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 71.1
1-Core 198
2-Core 389
113% 219 Pts
4-Core 753
8-Core 1,343
126% 1,048 Pts
64-Core 1,548
96% 1,548 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.2% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 80.5
42% 52.4 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 63
Splatting 89.9
52% 59.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PELADN 512GB
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERFM11.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,372
Write 4,272
Mixed 3,104
734% 3,249 MB/s
4K Read 59.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 86.9
273% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 1,504
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 1,301
931% 1,209 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 309%
SSK Storage 256GB
42GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 37.7
Write 35.2
Mixed 36.4
47% 36.4 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.9
1,144% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 8.3
DQ Write 20
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,340% 15.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G56C46S5.C8D 32GB
5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
152% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 62
MC Mixed 51.2
157% 55 GB/s
SC Read 44.8
SC Write 61.5
SC Mixed 49.6
148% 52 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 152%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOP0B0B 24SA2Y
Typical HA-4 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Peladn HA-4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $216Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback