Today's hottest deals

Intel SHARKBAY

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel SHARKBAY  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '24 at 21:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770TE
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 128
55% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 339
36% 290 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Intel(8086 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.5
2% 3.53 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 4.1
3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KI128G8 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF001D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 440
Write 166
Mixed 196
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 30.1
102% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 161
DQ Mixed 152
124% 176 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 85%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
32GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 7
32% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.4
128% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V6H 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 14.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 15.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 0R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 6% 52 66 52 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback