Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8266
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 08:32
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A10-8770E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 46.4
1-Core 54.4
2-Core 98.8
39% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 160
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
HP(103C 8266) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 21.09.02.02
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 5.5
3% 4.57 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 6.5
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JULA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 115 93 78 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 411
Write 339
Mixed 263
SusWrite 95.4
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 17.4
65% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 125
102% 151 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.67 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 24.1" 1280 720 HPN3690 HP E24i G4
Typical EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G3 Desktop Mini

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback