Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ZC-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire ZC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ZC-605
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMar 05 '24 at 03:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2127U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Memory 52.9
1-Core 48.2
2-Core 87.1
38% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 88.5
12% 88.3 Pts
64-Core 86.6
5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0789) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 336 338 344 338 349 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 428
Write 348
Mixed 259
SusWrite 340
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 25.5
87% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 195
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 161
122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.4% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.4
26% 9 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 40 32 60 20" 1280 720 ACRF170 AIO LCD
Typical Aspire ZC-605 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ZC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback