Lenovo 21JNS0F400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 21JNS0F400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21JNS0F400
Memory23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231228
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '24 at 03:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 143
2-Core 228
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 396
46% 356 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 50D1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 11.1
Reflection 16
Parallax 14.4
9% 13.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 17
Splatting 12.7
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00-1201 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 680 701 712 694 826 715 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 581
Write 821
Mixed 670
SusWrite 721
158% 698 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 16.1
76% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 359
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 105%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3340MF88HBF-3200 Samsung M471A2G44BM0-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 36
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback