HP Elite x360 1040 14 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Elite x360 1040 14 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 896D
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231005
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 03 '24 at 17:23
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Memory 53
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
89% 175 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 538
50% 414 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 896D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 24.6
18% 24.3 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 33.6
Splatting 19.6
20% 25.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDKBA512TFH-1BC1AABHA 512GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 637 652 1183 1620 953 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,298
Write 1,638
Mixed 1,356
SusWrite 949
348% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 55
214% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 346
254% 339 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 230%
Great: 403%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4RAH165VB-BCQK 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.1
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 39.8
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 23.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 112%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14" 1280 720 IVO8CBE
Typical Elite x360 1040 14 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP Elite x360 1040 14 inch G9 2-in-1 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback