Today's hottest deals

ECS A68F2P-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS A68F2P-M4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '24 at 20:19
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 61.4
2-Core 116
48% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 180
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Elitegroup(1019 9AC9) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 9.3
4% 6.83 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.2
5% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 49 55 46 60 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 77.9
Write 67.5
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 49.4
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1600 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 40 60 19.5" 1280 720 LEN60DF LEN E2054A
Typical A68F2P-M4 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A68F2P-M4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback