Today's hottest deals

HP 550-047c

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 550-047c  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '24 at 02:38
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 176
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 330
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 65.4
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 87.1
53% 72.1 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 47.9
47% 59 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 109 102 83 78 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 477
Write 159
Mixed 344
SusWrite 129
61% 278 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 44.8
145% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 124%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
727GB free
Firmware: UH4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 160 171 202 190 213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 432
Write 375
Mixed 152
SusWrite 202
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 9.4
58% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 85.8
DQ Mixed 16.8
36% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
43.5% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 13.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 56 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical 550-047c Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-047c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback