MSI PRO H610M-G WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D46)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 4 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D46
MotherboardMSI PRO H610M-G WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D46)  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '24 at 00:05
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 173
63% 112 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 278
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 82.9
Reflection 128
Parallax 158
68% 123 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 86.2
Splatting 154
117% 142 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Predator GM3500 512GB
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AAT8KA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 530 661 521 527 527 528 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 2,062
Write 1324
Mixed 1,205
SusWrite 549
285% 1,285 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 62.1
201% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 568
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 428
326% 445 MB/s
Poor: 156%
This bench: 199%
Great: 326%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2E3200C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 16.8
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 HKC2711 27E1QA
Typical PRO H610M-G WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D46) Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI PRO H610M-G WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D46)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback