Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCERVVO
MotherboardCERVVO B450M-F
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '24 at 12:59
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 67.4
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 188
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 282
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
5.76% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.97 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 6
Splatting 11.2
7% 7.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.76%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GS240 240GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW191129
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 413 418 360 191 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 479
Write 438
Mixed 393
SusWrite 319
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 14.2
112% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 16.6
72% 158 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB3/16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 13.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 75 0" 1024 705 Default
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback