Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220317
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '24 at 18:45
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 178
2-Core 352
111% 207 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,130
110% 903 Pts
64-Core 1,550
96% 1,550 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$395
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 211
Parallax 203
183% 213 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
129% 161 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS500G1X0E-00AFY0 500GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 613200WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,182
Write 3,892
Mixed 2,900
745% 3,325 MB/s
4K Read 82.1
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 108
396% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 1,625
DQ Write 1,329
DQ Mixed 1,424
1,081% 1,460 MB/s
Poor: 234% Great: 494%
S3SSDC480XEU 480GB
420GB free
Firmware: V0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 421 423 429 428 429 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 349
Write 100
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 425
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 16.4
65% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.1
DQ Write 29.9
DQ Mixed 27.8
21% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 97%
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
311GB free
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1412 581 580 576 587 573 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2067
Write 2,245
Mixed 1,986
SusWrite 718
394% 1,754 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 84.6
294% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,442
DQ Write 1,161
DQ Mixed 1,269
959% 1,291 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 275%
Great: 300%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
915GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 125 124 124 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 168
Write 172
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 124
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 33.9
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 31.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 35.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 90%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 240 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $781
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback