Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M K V2  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '24 at 08:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 87.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 310
99% 184 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 876
92% 740 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1814 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38
Reflection 42.2
Parallax 39.5
31% 39.9 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 28
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XD0R00G3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 77 188 82 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 464
Write 444
Mixed 383
SusWrite 99.7
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 40.4
148% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 202
165% 229 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 81%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 29.9
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 32.5
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 54 60 7.2" 1280 720 SHP10C9 SHARP LCD
Typical GA-A520M K V2 Builds (Compare 412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M K V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $372WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback