HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84E7
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210826
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '24 at 22:23
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Memory 50.4
1-Core 42.7
2-Core 150
44% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 121
8-Core 107
16% 114 Pts
64-Core 101
6% 101 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU)
HP(103C 84E7) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.40.42
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7.7
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 11.3
7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.45%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1014 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 575
Write 513
Mixed 346
106% 478 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 36.5
108% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 400
299% 396 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 155%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 131 131 130 129 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 118
Write 98
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 128
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-XN Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 24.7
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 39 153 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE07A5
Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cw0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback