Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag 1000977;2160089

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemWortmann_ag 1000977;2160089  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3598-B1
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '24 at 08:21
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2225
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 137
2-Core 260
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 642
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000
Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.99
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 204
Parallax 198
149% 195 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 143
Splatting 141
129% 160 fps
Poor: 125%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
879GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7801Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,404
Write 2,210
Mixed 2,179
505% 2,264 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 99.2
316% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,156
DQ Write 776
DQ Mixed 855
668% 929 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K40EB3-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 16.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 11.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.5" 1920 1009 WOR2447 TERRA 2447W
Typical 1000977;2160089 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

System: Wortmann_ag 1000977;2160089

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback