Today's hottest deals

Tactus GeoBook14M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTactus GeoBook14M  (all builds)
MotherboardGEO T140AN REV:1.0
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231027
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '24 at 20:24
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 36.2
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 161
51% 96.8 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 204
31% 225 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4889
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
2.61% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 4.1
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 0.4
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.61%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 128GB 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 356
Write 282
Mixed 274
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 12.7
79% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 0.7
43% 102 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x1GB
4 of 8 slots used
4GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 12 60 13.9" 1280 720 BOE0705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback