Samsung RV415

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung RV415  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP-RV415-CD3BR
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '24 at 19:15
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-300 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Memory 31.9
1-Core 9.4
2-Core 11.3
14% 17.5 Pts
4-Core 15
8-Core 14.6
2% 14.8 Pts
64-Core 13.2
1% 13.2 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Sanyo(144D C648) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.92% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.23 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 1.4
1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.92%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 59 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
10.1% Very poor
Read 71.8
Write 56.7
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 64.5
14% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.9
11% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
5.49% Terrible
MC Read 1.8
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2
5% 1.87 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 1.6
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 462
9% 462 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 16 0 15.4" 1280 720 CMN1469
Typical RV415 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV415

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback