Notebook NS5x_NS7xAU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemNotebook NS5x_NS7xAU  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NS5x_NS7xAU
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime61 Days
Run DateJan 31 '24 at 03:46
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 59.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 218
72% 133 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 602
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 51B1) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 19.1
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 14.5
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2543 2808 2746 2721 1715 1622 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,184
Write 2,938
Mixed 1863
SusWrite 2,360
528% 2,336 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 87.3
223% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 794
584% 769 MB/s
Poor: 252%
This bench: 338%
Great: 489%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMSO516F82-4800J 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0829
Typical NS5x_NS7xAU Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Notebook NS5x_NS7xAU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback