Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VG3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG3  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 20:47
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 451
47% 379 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 67%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1025 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.4% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 73.3
Parallax 87.1
54% 75.3 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 44.4
44% 55.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 3TB-$125
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 148 150 130 168 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 127
Write 166
Mixed 34
SusWrite 153
86% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992124 (997124) 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELD0DA DELL P2419H
Typical H61M-VG3 Builds (Compare 1,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG3 - $55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback