Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '24 at 16:52
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 320
41% 310 Pts
64-Core 314
20% 314 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 2050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 55.3
Parallax 73.6
48% 62.5 fps
MRender 58.8
Gravity 64.5
Splatting 38.7
43% 54 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 333 333 327 290 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 390
Write 348
Mixed 232
SusWrite 297
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 37.2
125% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 34.6
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 46.1
42% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2F8G64CB8HB5N-CG 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 0 26" 1280 720 CVT0003 CVTE TV
Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback