Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive452% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 18:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$185
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 210
2-Core 382
118% 225 Pts
4-Core 701
8-Core 1,213
116% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,423
88% 1,423 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 106%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Sapphire(174B 2438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.60
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 64.6
Reflection 66.2
Parallax 60.6
53% 63.8 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 64.4
Splatting 60.6
52% 63.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 1TB
764GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A230W3UA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3930 4117 3680 1758 1270 1268 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 3,354
Write 4,239
Mixed 2455
SusWrite 2,671
717% 3,180 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 77.5
261% 95.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,920
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 1717
1,267% 1,678 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 452%
Great: 514%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3238G321x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 33.4
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 42.1
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 38.1
113% 39.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 105%
Great: 170%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 27" 1280 720 IVM6643 PL2730Q
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $2,439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback