Biostar A58MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A58MD  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 09:43
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon X4 840 Quad Core
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.2% Average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 62
2-Core 123
46% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 163
21% 160 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Palit(1569 0FC6) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.14% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 11.6
Parallax 11.8
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 10.6
10% 12 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.14%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SWSSD128GS2T 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HT3414B6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 391 371 396 235 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 481
Write 391
Mixed 383
SusWrite 304
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 14.3
108% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 18.7
55% 115 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
40GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 80 83 81 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 86.9
Write 87.3
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 81
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
56GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 66 65 66 66 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 57.2
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 65.7
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
AMD R534G1601U1S 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 13.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 16 135 7 60 22" 1280 720 ACR0027 Acer V223W
Typical A58MD Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A58MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback