Micro UM480XT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemMicro UM480XT  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F6BFC
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 20:39
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 79.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 285
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,051
96% 807 Pts
64-Core 1298
80% 1298 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 25.2
15% 20.2 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 18.1
15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESO512GTLCW-EP3-2L 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFMG1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1362 308 286 312 303 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,124
Write 1,527
Mixed 1,262
SusWrite 482
248% 1,099 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 50.7
162% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 974
DQ Write 587
DQ Mixed 792
587% 784 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 160%
Great: 201%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH32D408SWM-16G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.8
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 28 7 60 48.8" 5120 1440 SAM7052 LC49G95T
Typical UM480XT Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Micro UM480XT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback