Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DB75EN
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120329
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 15 '24 at 19:31
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 159
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E151) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.4
6% 7.77 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 8
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
223GB free
Firmware: P0330AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 54 54 55 55 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 463
Write 406
Mixed 377
SusWrite 82.6
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 33
108% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 246
197% 278 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 92%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
373GB free
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 77 81 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 72.1
Write 84.9
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 79.7
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD403LJ 400GB-$183
372GB free
Firmware: CT100-11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 78 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 72.3
Write 87.6
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 78.7
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 42%
JMicron Tech 500GB
348GB free (System drive), PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 295 296 302 303 303 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 386
Mixed 338
SusWrite 306
478% 354 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 22.7
1,724% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.1
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 30
2,433% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 207%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV
Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback