Today's hottest deals

Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221025
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 71
2-Core 141
48% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 238
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 247
15% 247 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.52% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 2.9
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.52%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kimtigo 256GB 256GB
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 351 332 333 346 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 256
Write 317
Mixed 304
SusWrite 318
68% 299 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 24.3
57% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 232
172% 229 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 244%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45% Average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.9
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 535 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback