MSI MS-17L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF76 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-17L2  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 18:08
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 64.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 202
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 446
49% 387 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
MSI(1462 12EB) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1165
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.7% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 68
Parallax 72.8
58% 70.8 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 55.8
Splatting 51
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN540 SDDPNPF-512G-1032 512GB
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1287 1301 1299 1312 1287 1248 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 470
Mixed 1,312
SusWrite 1,289
260% 1,165 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.9
246% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 628
469% 628 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 247%
Great: 267%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston 9905795-002.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 13.7
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 1R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 27% 30 44 7 144 17.3" 1920 1009 AUO978F
Typical MS-17L2 Builds (Compare 2,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback