Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 12:42
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 295
8-Core 461
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$285
Nvidia(10DE 2504) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 120
Parallax 124
107% 125 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 102
Splatting 90
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 213 220 234 235 237 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.4% Good
Read 211
Write 194
Mixed 188
SusWrite 225
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 28.3
94% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 171
136% 190 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 119%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$35
329GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 120 119 119 120 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 151
Write 137
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 118
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
250% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 103%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB
77GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 12 3.7 2.7 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 103
Write 13.2
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 6.4
31% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R538G1601U2S 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 68.3
59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 30 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4E U28E590
Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $234
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $367
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback