Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime5.6 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 12:11
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 43.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 189
59% 111 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 330
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.3% Good
Lighting 78.5
Reflection 74.8
Parallax 76.1
64% 76.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 59.6
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SN350 1TB
772GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1105 1426 1561 1862 1846 1928 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 1,176
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 1,621
302% 1,333 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 27.7
131% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 408
352% 525 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 212%
Great: 350%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$37
243GB free
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 351 186 107 108 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 340
Write 378
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 192
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 24.3
4K Mixed 0.8
36% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 50.3
DQ Mixed 25.1
40% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$24
222GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 345 122 152 101 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 461
Write 433
Mixed 406
SusWrite 182
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 97.5
4K Mixed 32.3
142% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 50
112% 230 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CM4X8GD3200C16K4 32GB
2734, 2734, 2734, 2734 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 29.8
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 60 21.5" 1920 1009 IVM562E PLE2283H
Typical A320M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback