User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230316
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 15:46
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 199
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 730
68% 564 Pts
64-Core 1,825
113% 1,825 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.3% Very good
Lighting 94.1
Reflection 172
Parallax 153
77% 140 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 109
Splatting 80.5
76% 93.7 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xraydisk 256GB SSD 256GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 298 283 299 298 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 719
Write 303
Mixed 361
SusWrite 293
93% 419 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 31.1
122% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 471
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 188
192% 317 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 101%
Great: 164%
DGSR2256GS93T 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: W0704A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 420 422 428 428 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 473
Write 416
Mixed 406
SusWrite 426
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 18.3
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 34.2
76% 149 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.5
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 210 59 75 34.1" 2560 1017 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback