Today's hottest deals

Honor GLO-GXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive334% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemHonor GLO-GXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardHONOR GLO-GXXX-PCB
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2520 x 1680 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 15:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13500H
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 191
2-Core 381
110% 214 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,076
110% 887 Pts
64-Core 1,498
93% 1,498 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 100%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1EE7 203A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5084
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 23.8
17% 23.6 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 31.5
Splatting 18.2
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ANXA0105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2128 2269 780 758 742 745 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
334% Outstanding
Read 2,118
Write 2,395
Mixed 1595
SusWrite 1237
413% 1,836 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 96.1
334% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,729
DQ Write 1,451
DQ Mixed 1,604
1,198% 1,595 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 334%
Great: 327%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66AK6HX079 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
133% Outstanding
MC Read 51.7
MC Write 55
MC Mixed 49
148% 51.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 49.6
SC Mixed 21.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 133%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 90 14.2" 1280 720 CSO140B
Typical GLO-GXXX Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Honor GLO-GXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback