Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive7.97% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime25.8 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 00:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 162
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 441
46% 368 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 3397) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0210
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 9 24 8.5 9.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.97% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 57.1
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 14.6
7% 29.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 2.4
12% 5.93 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 15.9
24% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G4D1 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 42 60 72.3" 1536 864 SNY5401 SONY TV
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback