Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive371% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory51.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231018
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '24 at 11:52
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$274
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 204
2-Core 404
120% 231 Pts
4-Core 759
8-Core 1,312
125% 1,035 Pts
64-Core 1,909
118% 1,909 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 112%
Great: 122%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$145
862GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3521 2138 1979 2027 2106 2115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
371% Outstanding
Read 1,708
Write 3,002
Mixed 3,146
SusWrite 2,314
579% 2,543 MB/s
4K Read 64.3
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 93.4
299% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,732
DQ Write 1,341
DQ Mixed 1,590
1,175% 1,554 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 371%
Great: 587%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 421 414 399 415 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 446
Write 391
Mixed 304
SusWrite 415
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 25.8
92% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 208
172% 245 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 133%
MSI M450 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: EJFM61.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2935 2933 833 151 175 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,038
Write 1,652
Mixed 1,382
SusWrite 1,194
299% 1,316 MB/s
4K Read 43.7
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66
216% 77.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,872
DQ Write 1,114
DQ Mixed 1661
1,192% 1,549 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 248%
Great: 347%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$92
931GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 478 471 467 468 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 457
Mixed 434
SusWrite 473
104% 459 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 51.5
174% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 118%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3238G32G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6200 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
180% Outstanding
MC Read 59.6
MC Write 68.6
MC Mixed 66.1
185% 64.8 GB/s
SC Read 51.1
SC Write 76.3
SC Mixed 59
178% 62.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 152%
This bench: 180%
Great: 297%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 1R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 165 0" 5760 1080
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $2,253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback