HP 550-123a

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-123a  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B52
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '24 at 13:24
Run Duration423 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-8550 Radeon R5, 6 Compute Cores 2C+4G
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Memory 46.3
1-Core 30.3
2-Core 39.6
27% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 42.1
8-Core 34.7
5% 38.4 Pts
64-Core 46.5
3% 46.5 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 2B53) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2301.0
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.2 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 5.5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 39 15 9.2 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 1.9
Write 11.2
Mixed 3.9
SusWrite 19.6
7% 9.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 114%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 8GB
2GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.5 6 4.9 5.7 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 3.2
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 5.9
7% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
11% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - RAM benchmark error
Poor: 18% Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 19 12 60 23.5" 1280 720 SAM0C2E S24E310
Typical 550-123a Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-123a

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback