HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A21
Memory1.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 05:51
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
FP7, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 191
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 318
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8A21) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.5.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 33.7
15% 25.7 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 19.3
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BH1 512GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,896
Write 1,040
Mixed 970
286% 1,302 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 43.9
149% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 534
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 376
281% 383 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 400%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130
2TB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,974
Write 1,979
Mixed 1890
436% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 54.1
175% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 519
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 377
288% 395 MB/s
Poor: 223% Great: 435%
WD My Passport 2626 5TB
2TB free, PID 2626
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 77 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 84.3
Write 75.3
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 76.5
97% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 0.7
266% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL Kingston 9905801-008.A00G 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41.6
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 34.9
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 22.6
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 108%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 16" 1280 720 BOE0AAD
Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-e1xxx Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-e1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback