Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210303
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 18:13
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 145
2-Core 283
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,016
95% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,448
90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 263
Parallax 206
153% 219 fps
MRender 208
Gravity 162
Splatting 133
133% 168 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 137%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 500GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,395
Write 1,958
Mixed 1,778
454% 2,044 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 70.5
232% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 275
329% 584 MB/s
Sandisk PLUS 1TB
361GB free
Firmware: UH45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 72 96 139 202 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 465
Write 378
Mixed 166
SusWrite 140
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 10.2
63% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 27.6
36% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 54%
Samsung 870 250GB
232GB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 439 407 276 328 350 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 453
Write 410
Mixed 372
SusWrite 371
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 37.3
120% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 203
152% 203 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2D3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMW16GX4M2Z3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 38.3
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 35.6
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 0P 4R 9G 13B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 42% 31 217 60 60 24" 1920 1057 SAM0C82 S24E450
History: Score 31: 0P 2R 5G 6B | Score 60: 0P 4R 9G 13B
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback