Oegstone Q87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 5 months ago.

System	Oegstone Q87M-E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Q87M-E
Memory	24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150325
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '23 at 14:51
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 179 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 492 50% 405 Pts	64-Core 502 31% 502 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP 38,816 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09 Performing below potential (56^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	40.8% Average	Lighting 48.9 Reflection 59.1 Parallax 72.8 40% 60.3 fps	MRender 59.2 Gravity 58.2 Splatting 43.1 43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB 779 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 180 38 81 27 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 448 Write 360 Mixed 380 SusWrite 83.7 71% 318 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 25.1 110% 38.6 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 48.3 96% 190 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 101%
Fanxiang S102 Pro 1TB 338 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 98GB free Firmware: 628 SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 401 401 407 411 407 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Read 381 Write 421 Mixed 381 SusWrite 409 90% 398 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 57.9 4K Mixed 34.4 117% 40.1 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 301 222% 290 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 109%
Wd1004fbyz-23yc 00MX125D7A09664LEN 1TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 713GB free Firmware: WH08 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 189 190 189 187 193 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 205 Mixed 94.8 SusWrite 191 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 312% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	47.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 16.1 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 86 46% 86 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	33	209	59	75	27"	1280 720	PHLC208 PHL 271E1

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Oegstone Q87M-E

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	13x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	9x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	7x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	12x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	7x

SSD
T253256GB 256GBTeamBench 75%, 779 samples	5x
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $71Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	2x
HFS250G32TND-N1A2A 250GBBench 92%, 5,131 samples	2x

RAM
99U5403-160.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 649 samples	6x
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GBSamsungBench 46%, 6 samples	4x
99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 708 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $114

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $291	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353