Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1550 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180205
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 26 '23 at 22:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 74
2-Core 126
58% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 366
40% 314 Pts
64-Core 415
26% 415 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 838F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.97 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.9
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,400
Write 1191
Mixed 820
252% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 42.6
136% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 452
323% 420 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
299GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 124 128 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 83.6
Write 99.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 124
65% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS824A.M8FR Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
68.8% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 18.9
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 0P 4R 10G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 23% 65 190 52 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0532
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback