Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime12.4 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 16:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 73
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 620
68% 537 Pts
64-Core 620
38% 620 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Acer(1025 1238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 5.9
5% 6.33 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.5
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 152 165 169 188 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 181
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 172
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 250GB
175GB free, PID 3000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 30.8
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 32.8
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
45% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 17%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 1GB
0GB free, PID 0153
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.2
Write 9
Mixed 8
12% 9.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 14.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 20.7" 1280 720 ACR0458 Acer K212HQL
Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback