Today's hottest deals

MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7786
MotherboardMSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786)  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 22:58
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-3300 APU-$90
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 25.6
2-Core 49.7
27% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 50.8
8-Core 51.5
7% 51.2 Pts
64-Core 52.3
3% 52.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7470
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.5
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCT-256M3S 2.5 7mm 256GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VRDC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 100 121 127 141 140 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 124
Write 133
Mixed 121
SusWrite 124
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 13.7
4K Mixed 8.7
37% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.3
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 27.7
23% 31.6 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.7
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.1
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 5 0 60" 1280 720 VIZ0092 E601i-A3E
Typical A55M-P33 (MS-7786) Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A55M-P33 (MS-7786) - $48

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback