Today's hottest deals

Samsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG DP700A3D-S01CH
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '23 at 15:20
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 84
2-Core 131
64% 101 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 206
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Sanyo(144D B091) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
4.89% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5.3
5% 6.1 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.89%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 750GB-$77
566GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JF4OA0D0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 60 56 52 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 91.7
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 53.4
38% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 54 60 7.2" 1280 720 SEM0324 DM700A-D
Typical DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung DP700A3D/DM700A3D/DB701A3D/DP700A7D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $183
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback